Meghan Markle and Prince Harry faced criticism following their recent recognition as “Humanitarians of the Year” at the World Mental Health Day Gala held by Project Healthy Minds in New York City. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex received this honor on October 10, 2023, acknowledging their advocacy work through the Archewell Foundation. Despite this accolade, some commentators argue that the couple does not deserve such recognition due to their conduct since stepping back from royal duties in 2020.
Royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams expressed his concerns during an appearance on GB News. He stated that while their efforts to support mental health initiatives are commendable, their public behavior, particularly their criticism of the monarchy, tarnishes their achievements. Fitzwilliams remarked, “The Sussexes’ work to help those suffering from mental health problems is, of course, to be welcomed.” However, he emphasized the contradictions in their public image, noting that Prince Harry has publicly criticized his family, creating a significant rift, while Meghan Markle reportedly has no contact with her own family.
The couple’s recognition comes in the wake of their high-profile interviews and projects that have scrutinized the Royal Family. Their 2021 interview with Oprah Winfrey made headlines for its explosive claims, and their 2022 Netflix docuseries, “Harry and Meghan,” further detailed their grievances. Additionally, Harry’s memoir, “Spare,” released in January 2023, included personal revelations and criticisms that many view as unflattering portrayals of the monarchy.
Fitzwilliams pointed out the “ultimate irony” of the couple receiving the humanitarian award, drawing a contrast to current global issues. He referenced initiatives by former President Donald Trump aimed at promoting peace in the Gaza region, suggesting that the couple’s recognition is overshadowed by their controversial history with the Royal Family.
The couple’s dual focus on mental health and their strained familial relationships raises questions about the criteria for such awards. Critics argue that the coverage they receive is largely due to their royal connections, rather than the merits of their charitable work.
As the discussions surrounding their recent recognition continue, it remains to be seen how their actions and statements will shape public perception moving forward. The debate reflects a broader discourse on accountability and the expectations placed on public figures, particularly those with royal ties.
