A jury has begun hearing the case involving music producer Metro Boomin, who faces serious allegations from Vanessa LeMaistre, who claims he sexually assaulted her in 2016. The lawsuit alleges that LeMaistre blacked out after consuming alcohol and Xanax at his studio, where the assault reportedly took place. Boomin has denied these allegations, asserting that their encounter was consensual and that the lawsuit is merely a “classic celebrity shakedown.”
On September 23, 2023, opening arguments were presented to the jury, and already, LeMaistre’s legal team is pursuing a mistrial. They argue that Boomin’s defense team made inappropriate comments regarding LeMaistre’s sexual history without obtaining prior judicial approval. Michael Willemin, LeMaistre’s attorney, contends that these remarks have compromised the integrity of the jury, creating an irreparable bias in the proceedings.
Willemin stated, “If plaintiff’s counsel was provided fair warning and a hearing was held, the claim that plaintiff engaged in consensual sex with the defendant prior to the sexual assault would have been precluded.” He emphasized that had the court allowed for a proper discussion, the prejudicial nature of the comments could have been addressed effectively.
LeMaistre alleges that she met Metro Boomin in 2016, and they connected over shared experiences in music. She claims this bond was shattered following the alleged assault. In her lawsuit, she further asserts that she became pregnant as a result of the encounter. Notably, she references a lyric from Boomin’s song “Rap Saved Me,” in which the lines, “She took a Xanny, then she fainted,” are interpreted as a reflection of her experience.
The legal battle has drawn significant media attention, not only because of the serious nature of the allegations but also due to Metro Boomin’s prominent status in the music industry. Known for his work with top artists, including Offset, 21 Savage, and Quavo, Boomin’s career hangs in the balance as this case unfolds.
As the trial progresses, the implications for both parties are substantial. LeMaistre seeks justice and accountability, while Boomin aims to clear his name in what he describes as a baseless accusation. The outcome will likely have lasting effects on their lives and careers.
With the jury’s deliberations and potential rulings on the mistrial request looming, the focus remains on the courtroom proceedings and the evidence presented. As this high-profile case continues, it serves as a stark reminder of the complexities and challenges surrounding accusations of sexual assault, particularly in the public eye.
