A recent article by Maya Posch has sparked a lively debate regarding the evolution of consumer electronics design, posing the provocative argument that we are witnessing the “Death of Industrial Design.” Her piece, published on Hackaday.com, critiques the trend where the principle of “form follows function” has led to a homogenization of devices, leaving them visually indistinct.
According to Posch, contemporary smartphones serve as prime examples of this trend. Most models feature a flat screen with minimal bezels, making them nearly indistinguishable from one another. This design philosophy prioritizes functionality to such an extent that the aesthetic value of these devices has been sacrificed. In her view, smartphones have become “non-objects,” designed to fade into the background rather than to be celebrated as works of industrial art.
The response to Posch’s assertions has been passionate, highlighting a collective yearning for attractive and functional design. Many commentators argue that while there is truth in the criticism of bland electronics, the situation is not universally applicable. For instance, architectural design retains diversity, as homes and buildings around the world vary significantly despite serving the same fundamental purpose. This stands in contrast to the uniformity seen in smartphone designs.
Nevertheless, Posch points out that this lack of individuality has prompted consumers to personalize their devices in creative ways. A prime example is the widespread use of decorative cases for smartphones, which contradicts the trend toward slimness. In an era where devices are almost identical, many users opt to add thickness and personal flair through aftermarket cases.
This desire for personal expression may also link to burgeoning movements within the tech community, such as the cyberdeck movement and the custom mechanical keyboard phenomenon. These trends reflect a broader human impulse to infuse personal identity into the technology we use daily. While purchasing a phone case may not equate to the creativity involved in hardware hacking, it allows users to exercise their design preferences and assert individuality.
Posch’s article raises intriguing questions about the balance between form and function in modern design. She suggests that the rise of minimalist smartphone designs might inadvertently resolve the longstanding debate over these two elements. The concept of a “nothing” design could pave the way for easier personalization, enabling consumers to adapt their devices to suit their tastes without the constraints imposed by the manufacturers.
As the discussion surrounding consumer electronics design continues, it remains clear that the push for personalization is a powerful force. The article, part of a weekly newsletter from Hackaday.com, emphasizes how the need for devices to resonate personally with users may ultimately shape the future of industrial design.
For readers interested in exploring similar topics, the newsletter features a selection of articles each week, highlighting innovations and insights from the tech world. To receive these updates, individuals can subscribe to the newsletter for weekly delivery.
