A 60-year-old woman from Maryland is grappling with a difficult choice regarding her engagement to a Danish man after he declined to provide financial support during a challenging period. The couple, who have been dating for a year, became engaged several months ago, but the relationship has faced significant strain as the woman navigates personal and financial difficulties.
The woman, who shares a 21-year-old daughter with high-functioning autism, experienced an eviction from her home after losing her second job. During this time, she sought help from her fiancé, asking for $2,000 to avoid further distress. His response was dismissive; he refused to offer assistance, expressing discomfort at the idea of being a financial provider. Instead, he suggested she reach out to her ex-husband for help.
After being unable to secure the funds, the woman and her daughter were forced to live with a friend in another state. Although she eventually found a second job, the situation has taken a toll on her family life. Initially, she had been candid with her fiancé about her daughter’s needs, asking if this would be a deal-breaker in their relationship. He assured her it would not; however, his current stance appears to contradict that promise.
As the couple discussed plans for moving to Denmark, the fiancé expressed a desire for the daughter to leave their shared home as soon as possible. This is particularly concerning for the woman, who worries about her daughter’s ability to adapt to a foreign country where she does not speak the language. Compounding the stress, the fiancé also indicated that the woman’s cat would not be welcome in their new life together.
In a recent letter to an advice column, the woman expressed her feelings of hurt and betrayal regarding her fiancé’s demands. She emphasized her belief that family should support one another, especially in times of need, and questioned whether this relationship could continue under such conditions. Her daughter is also affected, feeling rejected by someone who was supposed to be a supportive figure in their lives.
The advice given to the woman was stark: consider the numerous red flags present in the relationship. Observers noted that the fiancé’s reluctance to provide financial support, despite knowing the woman’s precarious situation, reflects a deeper incompatibility. Many believe that if she relocates to Denmark, the fiancé’s behavior is unlikely to change, and the challenges faced may only intensify.
As the woman contemplates her next steps, she must weigh the implications of remaining in a relationship that may not offer the support and understanding she and her daughter need. The situation underscores the importance of partnership in times of crisis and the necessity of aligning values and expectations in a relationship.
Ultimately, her well-being and that of her daughter should take precedence in making this significant life decision.
