UPDATE: An international coalition of over 85 climate experts has just released a scathing 439-page review condemning a report from the Trump administration’s Energy Department as “not scientifically credible.” The experts argue that the Energy Department’s 151-page report, authored by a team selected by Secretary Chris Wright, a former fossil fuel executive, fails to represent the current scientific understanding of climate change.
The Energy Department’s controversial report claims that “carbon dioxide-induced warming appears to be less damaging economically than commonly believed,” and suggests that “aggressive mitigation strategies” for greenhouse gas emissions could be more harmful than beneficial. This rhetoric aligns with interests that benefit the oil and gas industry, raising alarm among climate scientists.
In a statement, Wright asserted, “Climate change is real, and it deserves attention. But it is not the greatest threat facing humanity.” This dismissal has sparked outrage and led to a lawsuit in August from environmental groups and independent scientists, claiming the report’s production violated transparency laws.
The latest review, spearheaded by Andrew Dessler, director of the Texas Center for Extreme Weather at Texas A&M University, highlights pervasive issues, stating the report is “full of errors,” “biased,” and “not fit to inform policy.” Dessler expressed his frustration on social media, gathering support from fellow scientists who echoed his sentiments.
“This report makes a mockery of science,” Dessler told CBS News. “We felt an urgent need to respond.” The group submitted their findings during the 30-day public comment window, which has already seen over 2,333 comments submitted by concerned citizens and experts alike.
A review by the American Meteorological Society corroborates these findings, identifying “five foundational flaws” that undermine the report’s scientific credibility. Dessler’s coalition meticulously outlines the errors, criticizing the selective citation of literature and the absence of accurate context in the Energy Department’s claims.
Critics argue that this report exemplifies a broader trend within the federal government under the Trump administration to manipulate scientific processes for political gain. Former Deputy Assistant Secretary for Climate Change and Health Equity Dr. John Balbus warns, “This administration wants to take control of the scientific process,” referencing similar tactics used around vaccine information.
Despite the administration’s history of sidelining scientists—around 400 were dismissed from their roles in key climate change reporting—many have regrouped to combat the misinformation emanating from federal sources. Last week, major health organizations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, released guidelines that contradict CDC recommendations, reflecting the ongoing struggle over scientific integrity.
As federal employees continue to risk their careers by speaking out against policy changes, Balbus emphasizes the significance of their actions: “When nearly a thousand public servants risk their livelihoods, that is a clear warning.”
With this urgent response from climate experts, the fight against misinformation in climate science is intensifying. The Energy Department’s report faces mounting scrutiny, and the next steps are critical as the scientific community rallies to uphold accurate climate data and policy.
Stay tuned for further developments in this unfolding story that holds profound implications for climate policy and public health.
